Product page

Tacx NEO 3M

Sourced specs, what independent reviewers found, and who it suits.

Published Updated By SmartBikeWiki editorial

Compiled from manufacturer pages and named independent reviewers, checked .

Spec sheet

Garmin (Tacx) Tacx NEO 3M specifications, manufacturer claims
TypeSmart trainer
Claimed power accuracy<1% (Garmin spec table)
Max power claim2,200 W (stated as sprint stability up to 2,200 w)
Max simulated grade25%
Min simulated gradeNot verified from a primary source
FlywheelVirtual (variable inertia up to 125 kg equivalent)
Noise claimNot verified from a primary source
Weight23.6 kg / 52.0 lb
Max rider weightNot verified from a primary source
ConnectivityANT+, dual Bluetooth

These numbers are the manufacturer's claims, recorded as stated, not measurements by us. Database record: Garmin (Tacx) Tacx NEO 3M. Source: garmin.com, checked September 2026.

What independent reviewers found

Findings are paraphrased from the reviewer's own page and credited to them. We ran no tests. Where the reviewer tested an earlier or related model, the reviewed model is named.

DC Rainmaker (Ray Maker)

December 2023

Reviewed model
Tacx NEO 3M
What was measured
Accuracy against Favero pedals: 8-minute intervals near 300 W, low-cadence ramp down, ERG control
What was reported
Describes it as one of the most accurate trainers he has tested, with no drift over the steady intervals and power matching down to the cadence where it cut out; he also rates its ERG-mode control very highly and criticises the price and the bulk of the rear housing.

BikeRadar

February 2025

Reviewed model
Tacx NEO 3M
What was measured
Power against Favero Assioma Duo and Quarq DFour DUB; noise at 150 W and 600 W; ERG; motion
What was reported
Reports it matching both references throughout, ERG described as the best of any trainer they have tested, noise 63-65 dB at 150 W and over 70 dB at 600 W, and about 5 cm of motion that felt awkward in sprints. Marks it down for missing Wi-Fi, no high-speed data mode and no sensor bridging at the price.

OutdoorGearLab

April 2024

Reviewed model
Garmin Tacx NEO 3M
What was measured
Power against independent pedals; ERG ramp time; motion; portability
What was reported
Reports power within 0-2 W (under 1%) of independent pedal power, ERG reaching target in 3-4 seconds without spikes, and about 2 inches of fore-aft motion adding realism. Its favourite trainer overall but too expensive for its top award; better for a fixed basement setup than for moving around (52 lb).

Research notes and context

Buy the NEO 3M if ERG accuracy and clean power data are the whole point and you can pay $1,799.99 (Garmin’s price, checked 29 Sept 2026; the 2023 launch price was $1,999.99). Skip it if you want Wi-Fi, a race-mode data rate or sensor bridging: BikeRadar marks it down for all three. Three independent reviewers rate its data as among the best they have measured.

What reviewers found

  • BikeRadar (Feb 2025): matched Favero Assioma Duo pedals and a Quarq DFour DUB spider throughout; ERG described as the best of any trainer tested; noise 63-65 dB at 150 W and over 70 dB at 600 W; about 5 cm of motion that felt awkward when sprinting.
  • OutdoorGearLab (Apr 2024): power within 0-2 W (under 1%) of independent pedals, ERG reaching target in 3-4 seconds without spikes, about 2 inches of fore-aft motion. Its favourite trainer, but too expensive for its top award, and better for a fixed basement than for moving around at 52 lb.
  • DC Rainmaker (Dec 2023): one of the most accurate trainers he had tested, no drift over steady intervals, very good ERG, but a high price and a bulky rear housing.

Read together: the accuracy and ERG verdicts are unanimous, and the criticism is about price and missing features, not the measurement.

Is motion worth paying for?

The motion plates are built in, so you pay for them whether or not you want them. Reviewers describe the effect as modest (2 to 5 cm) and awkward in sprints. If side-to-side feel matters, a smart bike or a trainer with a separate rocker plate is another route. For a plain trainer, the NEO 2T uses the same 2,200 W, 25% claims at a lower price.

Who should skip it

Racers who want 10 Hz data and Wi-Fi, and anyone whose priority is the lowest price per claimed accuracy point (see power accuracy for why a 1% versus 2% claim rarely changes training).

For a head-to-head with Wahoo’s flagship, see KICKR V6 vs Tacx NEO 3M.

Compared with its closest rivals

Figures are manufacturer claims and store prices from the database; the last column counts independent reviewers whose findings are recorded there.

ModelPriceClaimed accuracyMax powerMax gradeIndependent reviewers in database
Tacx NEO 3M$1,799.99under 1%2,200 W25%3
Tacx NEO 2T$1,099.99under 1%2,200 W25%3
Wahoo KICKR (2022, WiFi)$1,049.99±1%2,200 W20%2
Elite Justo 2€1,125 (Elite store, EUR)under 1%2,300 W24%0
Wahoo KICKR BIKE SHIFT$2,549.99±1%2,200 W20%2

How this page was researched

Read for this page: Tacx NEO 3M manufacturer spec page; DC Rainmaker on Tacx NEO 3M; BikeRadar on Tacx NEO 3M, and 1 more listed above. Checked 29 Sept 2026. SmartBikeWiki runs no tests of its own; every measurement above is the named reviewer’s, paraphrased. Prices change: the store price is the one shown on the manufacturer’s site on the date in the database, which is re-checked every 90 days.

Sources

Update log

  1. Rewrote from Garmin spec table and price, updated $1,999.99 launch price to the current $1,799.99 and added BikeRadar and OutdoorGearLab findings.